Solution for more than 13 teams

The place for speaking your mind on current goings-on in F1
Post Reply
User avatar
Aerond
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 3504
Joined: 25 Mar 2010, 19:26
Location: Anschlussland

Solution for more than 13 teams

Post by Aerond »

Just came with a crazy idea, that will never happen in Formula One, as how to acommodate more than 13 teams :lol:

If there´re more than 13 teams (or 26 drivers), the grid should be divided into 2 heats. Each heat should run in a shorter race on saturday (let´s say 30% of the race distance), and the top drivers in each heat will run in the full GP on Sunday to form a grid of 24 or 26. So everybody would qualify somehow. Don´t think is a good idea anyway and there will probably not be more than 13 teams interested in Formula One ever again but...
Tread lightly in ARWS. Every decision might be your last.
User avatar
TomWazzleshaw
Posts: 14370
Joined: 01 Apr 2009, 04:42
Location: Curva do lel
Contact:

Re: Solution for more than 13 teams

Post by TomWazzleshaw »

Sounds like a good concept... The fans get more action, Bernie gets more TV time for his sponsors and we can see Virgins somehow beating McLarens in a race...

In short everyone wins... well except Red Bull who DNQ for half the races anyway :lol:
Biscione wrote:"Some Turkemenistani gulag repurposed for residential use" is the best way yet I've heard to describe North / East Glasgow.
User avatar
CarlosFerreira
Posts: 4974
Joined: 02 Apr 2009, 14:31
Location: UK

Re: Solution for more than 13 teams

Post by CarlosFerreira »

I wonder if Bernie could sell more screen time to TVs - not everywhere are FPs transmitted anyway. And, besides, we all know from the past exploits of many a reject that, as you fail to appear on the Sunday race a couple of times, sponsors will pull the plug and that's it.

Oh, and pit space is already at a premium anyway, so teams are bound not to sign up for this.
Stay home, Colin Kolles!
JeanDenisAlcatraz
Posts: 208
Joined: 19 Aug 2009, 14:14
Location: London, UK

Re: Solution for more than 13 teams

Post by JeanDenisAlcatraz »

PREQUALIFYING!!!!

How hard is it?

Let's get some Darwinism back into F1.
User avatar
ADx_Wales
Posts: 2523
Joined: 05 Dec 2009, 19:37
Location: The Fortress of Sofatude, with a laptop and a penchant for buying now TV day passes for F1 races.

Re: Solution for more than 13 teams

Post by ADx_Wales »

If there's 107% then anyone should be allowed to take part, if theres less than 12 teams dont use 107% simple as.

Also, revert back to the hour qualifying, that should free some space on the track up then, and also return to the norm in F1, fed up of this once-interesting-for-twelve-seconds knockout format.
"The worst part of my body that hurt in the fire was my balls" Gerhard Berger on Imola 1989
User avatar
Tealy
Posts: 581
Joined: 28 Mar 2009, 18:12
Location: Sunderland, England

Re: Solution for more than 13 teams

Post by Tealy »

ADx_Wales wrote:If there's 107% then anyone should be allowed to take part, if theres less than 12 teams dont use 107% simple as.

Also, revert back to the hour qualifying, that should free some space on the track up then, and also return to the norm in F1, fed up of this once-interesting-for-twelve-seconds knockout format.


Sadly that wouldn't work thanks to limited garage space and limited grid space at places like Monaco. It's a shame because that would be a great way of allowing anyone to join the formula provided they can be fast enough to qualify.
User avatar
uh_clem
Posts: 20
Joined: 30 Mar 2009, 13:20
Location: Cyberia

Re: Solution for more than 13 teams

Post by uh_clem »

How about a knock-out race to go with the knock-out qualifying? Run 1/3 of the race, then eliminate the last seven finishers then run the next 1/3 and eliminate the next seven, etc.

(This is meant to be a joke.) :lol:
User avatar
Nessafox
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 6251
Joined: 30 Nov 2009, 19:45
Location: Stupid, sexy Flanders.

Re: Solution for more than 13 teams

Post by Nessafox »

let every circuit decide for itself how much cars are allowed, like it used to be
24 cars are more than enough for monaco, but spa could easily fit 6 to 10 more because it's a long track.


of course with the 107% rule
I don't know what i want and i want it now!
User avatar
Aerospeed
Posts: 4948
Joined: 22 Aug 2010, 18:58
Location: In too much snow right now

Re: Solution for more than 13 teams

Post by Aerospeed »

JeanDenisAlcatraz wrote:PREQUALIFYING!!!!

How hard is it?

Let's get some Darwinism back into F1.


Give this guy a beer.
Mistakes in potatoes will ALWAYS happen :P
Trulli bad puns...
IN JAIL NO ONE CAN HEAR YOU SCREAM
User avatar
Nessafox
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 6251
Joined: 30 Nov 2009, 19:45
Location: Stupid, sexy Flanders.

Re: Solution for more than 13 teams

Post by Nessafox »

JeremyMcClean wrote:
JeanDenisAlcatraz wrote:PREQUALIFYING!!!!

How hard is it?

Let's get some Darwinism back into F1.


Give this guy a beer.

nah, a creationist f1 would be more funny :D
I don't know what i want and i want it now!
Popi_Larrauri
Posts: 416
Joined: 05 Apr 2009, 19:53
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina

Re: Solution for more than 13 teams

Post by Popi_Larrauri »

Wizzie wrote:Sounds like a good concept... The fans get more action, Bernie gets more TV time for his sponsors and we can see Virgins somehow beating McLarens in a race...

In short everyone wins... well except Red Bull who DNQ for half the races anyway :lol:



Or Petrov never reaching a sunday...
Winners have lots of friends, losers have good friends.
User avatar
Captain Hammer
Posts: 3459
Joined: 30 Mar 2009, 11:10

Re: Solution for more than 13 teams

Post by Captain Hammer »

JeanDenisAlcatraz wrote:PREQUALIFYING!!!!

How hard is it?

Incredibly. Pre-qualifying worked when it cost as little as $500,000 to establish a team. Of the 2010 competitors, Virgin have the smallest budget at somewhere under $40,000,000. If there is a chance that a team will not appear on the grid, then sponsors will not pay tens of millions of dollars to back them. Without that sponsorship, the teams will not be able to build and develop cars. If teams cannot build and develop cars, they will not qualify. If they do not qualify, they cannot race. If they do not race, then there is no reaso for them to exist. If there is no reason for them to exist, then they will not. You could re-introduce pre-qualifying, but you're only ever going to get twenty-six cars showing up. Formula 1 is so expensive that no-one in their right mind would be able to justify spending the tens of millions of dollars needed to compete if there was even the slightest chance that they would not be able to compete at all.
mario wrote:I'm wondering what the hell has been going on in this thread [...] it's turned into a bizarre detour into mythical flying horses and the sort of search engine results that CoopsII is going to have a very hard time explaining ...
User avatar
DonTirri
Posts: 1177
Joined: 28 Apr 2009, 22:12
Location: Herttoniemi, Helsinki, Finland, Europe, Earth, Sol System, Milky Way.

Re: Solution for more than 13 teams

Post by DonTirri »

Captain Hammer wrote:
JeanDenisAlcatraz wrote:PREQUALIFYING!!!!

How hard is it?

Incredibly. Pre-qualifying worked when it cost as little as $500,000 to establish a team. Of the 2010 competitors, Virgin have the smallest budget at somewhere under $40,000,000. If there is a chance that a team will not appear on the grid, then sponsors will not pay tens of millions of dollars to back them. Without that sponsorship, the teams will not be able to build and develop cars. If teams cannot build and develop cars, they will not qualify. If they do not qualify, they cannot race. If they do not race, then there is no reaso for them to exist. If there is no reason for them to exist, then they will not. You could re-introduce pre-qualifying, but you're only ever going to get twenty-six cars showing up. Formula 1 is so expensive that no-one in their right mind would be able to justify spending the tens of millions of dollars needed to compete if there was even the slightest chance that they would not be able to compete at all.


Awww captain, don't go ruining everyones dreams with your dose of realism! Pre-qualifying was awesome and should be returned ASAP!

(This post may or may not be sarcastic, draw your own conclusions)
I got Pointed Opinions and I ain't afraid to use em!
F1rejects no.1Räikkönen and Vettel fan.
BTW, thats Räikkönen with two K's and two N's. Not Raikonnen (Raikkonen is fine if you have no umlauts though)
User avatar
TomWazzleshaw
Posts: 14370
Joined: 01 Apr 2009, 04:42
Location: Curva do lel
Contact:

Re: Solution for more than 13 teams

Post by TomWazzleshaw »

DonTirri wrote:(This post may or may not be sarcastic, draw your own conclusions)


I was about to say something about sarcasm but that would have made me Captain Obvious.
Biscione wrote:"Some Turkemenistani gulag repurposed for residential use" is the best way yet I've heard to describe North / East Glasgow.
jackanderton
Posts: 706
Joined: 29 May 2009, 12:40

Re: Solution for more than 13 teams

Post by jackanderton »

Actually having 13 teams would be a good start.
User avatar
mario
Posts: 8124
Joined: 31 Oct 2009, 17:13

Re: Solution for more than 13 teams

Post by mario »

Captain Hammer wrote:
JeanDenisAlcatraz wrote:PREQUALIFYING!!!!

How hard is it?

Incredibly. Pre-qualifying worked when it cost as little as $500,000 to establish a team. Of the 2010 competitors, Virgin have the smallest budget at somewhere under $40,000,000. If there is a chance that a team will not appear on the grid, then sponsors will not pay tens of millions of dollars to back them. Without that sponsorship, the teams will not be able to build and develop cars. If teams cannot build and develop cars, they will not qualify. If they do not qualify, they cannot race. If they do not race, then there is no reaso for them to exist. If there is no reason for them to exist, then they will not. You could re-introduce pre-qualifying, but you're only ever going to get twenty-six cars showing up. Formula 1 is so expensive that no-one in their right mind would be able to justify spending the tens of millions of dollars needed to compete if there was even the slightest chance that they would not be able to compete at all.

Exactly - an engine supply contract alone sets you back €5 million these days, so putting together an F1 team these days is not a cheap operation. And it isn't just putting together a car, but having a team of competent mechanics to eke the most out of the car (Super Aguri got a fair bit out of a lightly updated 2006 car by prioritising their set up work) and to keep the car running out on track, a design team to get the car through the FIA's mandatory crash tests and so on.

Whilst you may see just a few people at the track at any one time, there are a lot of people behind the scenes - Virgin Racing, which is the smallest team (for which you can find staff numbers, as there aren't any figures for HRT), started the season with 180 employees. It takes a lot longer to design a car these days as well - most of the big teams have two design teams, with one working on the current seasons car, and one working on next years car (although the head count restrictions coming up are likely to be a problem).

In the 1970's, when the Cosworth engine was £100,000 a year (allowing for inflation, that would be in the order of £750,000 a year today), you could buy just about everything you needed off the shelf (transmissions from Hewland, chassis from March and so on) to get a car on the track for a relatively low sum. Hesketh Racing is the perfect example of that era of F1 kitcars, as it were - March 731 chassis, Hewland FGA gearbox, Firestone tyres (to begin with), and, of course, a Cosworth DFV. Of course, with customer cars banned, everything now has to be done in house, which is expensive and time consuming.

jackanderton wrote:Actually having 13 teams would be a good start.

A good point, as Formula 1 is a very expensive proposition at the moment in comparison to most other racing series. Although many manufacturers have been feeling the pinch in other series (such as Endurance Racing, where the ACO is bringing is cost capping regulations), money problems have been key in the withdrawal of a number of entries this year.
Prodrive refused as they are currently increasing operations elsewhere (in the Le Mans series with Aston Martin, and in rallying with the Mini Clubman). Lola dropped all plans altogether this year, and ART GP withdrew their entry almost as soon as it was entered because of a lack of sponsor interest. It's hard enough for those at the back of the grid to attract sponsors, but if you were not even guaranteed to start the race, potential sponsors are going to be even more recalcitrant, especially if you could only attend a handful of races.

In fact, Formula 1 looks quite overpriced compared to other series - an Le Mans Prototype car, for example, under the 2011 ACO rules would cost a mere €400,000 to buy http://www.lemans.org/en/news/2011-LE-M ... S_628.html
If, and this is a big if, the teams can impose the cost capping regulations and make them work, then in the future we might see the grid expanding. As it is, we might not even have 12 teams next year - HRT's future is still uncertain, and Red Bull are still trying to offload Toro Rosso onto somebody else, now that the junior team is increasingly unimportant to them. The FIA's main efforts in the next few years are likely to be be mainly focussing around keeping existing teams afloat for the next few years instead of expanding the grid...
Martin Brundle, on watching a replay of Grosjean spinning:
"The problem with Grosjean is that he want to take a look back at the corner he's just exited"
User avatar
f1-gast
Posts: 817
Joined: 25 Feb 2010, 18:04
Location: The Netherlands / Noord-Brabant
Contact:

Re: Solution for more than 13 teams

Post by f1-gast »

id like it to have the 107% rule back.
==ROBIN FRIJNS FOR SAUBER IN 2014==
Founder of unracedf1.com and a formula 1 fan since 1994 :) !
http://www.facebook.com/UnracedF1
User avatar
FullMetalJack
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 6270
Joined: 31 Mar 2009, 15:32
Location: Some place far away. Yes, that'll do.

Re: Solution for more than 13 teams

Post by FullMetalJack »

f1-gast wrote:id like it to have the 107% rule back.


Well, it's coming back for 2011.
I like the way Snrub thinks!
User avatar
Captain Hammer
Posts: 3459
Joined: 30 Mar 2009, 11:10

Re: Solution for more than 13 teams

Post by Captain Hammer »

107% isn't going to do anything. I wholly expect all the teams to be comfortably within that margin next year. Even Hispania. The only reason it was reintroduced was because Luca had a tantrum in Montreal when Alonso was supposedly held up by a Virgin (a Virgin that was off the racing line, it should be said) and Button got by him.
mario wrote:I'm wondering what the hell has been going on in this thread [...] it's turned into a bizarre detour into mythical flying horses and the sort of search engine results that CoopsII is going to have a very hard time explaining ...
Post Reply