Jocke1 wrote:sswishbone wrote:WTF? red flag!!! WHY!?!?!
Due to the collision but why red flag? Was it because Alonso was driving a broken car around?
Debris on track possibly.
I believe that's exactly why the red was thrown.
Jocke1 wrote:sswishbone wrote:WTF? red flag!!! WHY!?!?!
Due to the collision but why red flag? Was it because Alonso was driving a broken car around?
Debris on track possibly.
Albert Einstein wrote:Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe.
Rob Dylan wrote:Mercedes paying homage to the other W12 chassis by breaking down 30 minutes in
UgncreativeUsergname wrote:OMG GUYS VETTELS ON THE FRONT ROW F1 IS RUINED!!!!
UgncreativeUsergname wrote:OMG GUYS VETTELS ON THE FRONT ROW F1 IS RUINED!!!!
Allard Kalff in 1994 wrote:OH!! Schumacher in the wall! Right in front of us, Michael Schumacher is in the wall! He's hit the pitwall, he c... Ah, it's Jos Verstappen.
Albert Einstein wrote:Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe.
good_Ralf wrote:Bottas now has a 3-place grid penalty for blocking Ricciardo. That's yet another poor piece of driving from the Finn this year, after the tap with the wall in Albert Park.
go_Rubens wrote:Intellicast says that there is a 60% chance of thunderstorms at the start of the race. It also says that at 5, it's 80%, and at 6, it is 60%. Not looking too good for a dry race. Which sucks, as I wanted to see a proper attrition race in the heat.
Rob Dylan wrote:Mercedes paying homage to the other W12 chassis by breaking down 30 minutes in
Barbazza wrote:good_Ralf wrote:Bottas now has a 3-place grid penalty for blocking Ricciardo. That's yet another poor piece of driving from the Finn this year, after the tap with the wall in Albert Park.
I disagree. I thought he'd left him plenty of room. It's not like they're driving at bloody Monaco!
good_Ralf wrote:Bottas now has a 3-place grid penalty for blocking Ricciardo. That's yet another poor piece of driving from the Finn this year, after the tap with the wall in Albert Park.
Salamander wrote:good_Ralf wrote:Sad to see both Williams eliminated in Q2. They just can't seem to get the best out of that car and I fear that by the time they do, they'll have lost ground (a lot of it) to their rivals. In other words, wasting a great opportunity, which may not appear again for a long time.
It's called their car sucks in the wet.
CoopsII wrote:Wouldnt it be lovely if just for once someone said "I really want to emulate Boutsen and get a decent, if not spectacular, result with some solid points".
mario wrote:sswishbone wrote:James Allen has just said the Life W12 is his fave engine ever!! OMG!!
His description of the noise was fantastic too - "imagine filling a dustbin with nuts and bolts and then kicking it down the stairs"...
watka wrote:However, let's put all this motor racing malarkey aside for the moment because THIS IS THE BIG NEWS IN FORMULA 1 RIGHT NOW
Mitch Hedberg wrote:I want to be a race car passenger: just a guy who bugs the driver. Say man, can I turn on the radio? You should slow down. Why do we gotta keep going in circles? Man, you really like Tide...
Ataxia wrote:watka wrote:However, let's put all this motor racing malarkey aside for the moment because THIS IS THE BIG NEWS IN FORMULA 1 RIGHT NOW
Blimey, he's punching above his weight isn't he?
dinizintheoven wrote:mario wrote:sswishbone wrote:James Allen has just said the Life W12 is his fave engine ever!! OMG!!
His description of the noise was fantastic too - "imagine filling a dustbin with nuts and bolts and then kicking it down the stairs"...
"This content doesn't seem to be working. Try again later."
That's what I've been doing for the last two days, BBC. Why is it that the only time I need to access a radio broadcast after it's gone, it's the one that steadfastly fails to work - and over three browsers and two operating systems?
There's a GMIF1P in there and it must not be wasted!
More_Blue_Flags wrote:Salamander wrote:good_Ralf wrote:Sad to see both Williams eliminated in Q2. They just can't seem to get the best out of that car and I fear that by the time they do, they'll have lost ground (a lot of it) to their rivals. In other words, wasting a great opportunity, which may not appear again for a long time.
It's called their car sucks in the wet.
It certainly looks like a handful in the wet and less impressive in qualifying, but I am not sure that it would be too far behind the McLaren if Williams hadn't messed around with inters for so long. Interesting to see if the Williams are that much slower over a race. Overall, a bit disappointing for this Williams bandwagon member, but hopefully the FW36 can exploit the conditions in the next few races - until about Monaco.
On the plus side, Hulkenberg looked quietly impressive.
watka wrote:THIS IS THE BIG NEWS IN FORMULA 1 RIGHT NOW
Fetzie on Ferrari wrote:How does a driver hurtling around a race track while they're sous-viding in their overalls have a better understanding of the race than a team of strategy engineers in an air-conditioned room?l
Fetzie on Ferrari wrote:How does a driver hurtling around a race track while they're sous-viding in their overalls have a better understanding of the race than a team of strategy engineers in an air-conditioned room?l
East Londoner wrote:Kimi, you've just been lapped, and you're STILL behind Ericsson. Please, give your seat up to Grosjean or Chilton, they deserve it so much more.
eytl wrote:Ericsson and Chilton close on track. The hairdo battle is in full swing!