Hehehehehehehe.
I do prefer the sound of "McLaren-Honda" to "McLaren-Mercedes."
Klon, on Alt-F1 wrote: I like to think it's more poker than gambling, though.
CoopsII wrote:McLaren - CHANGE THE LIVERY FOR 2015! No reds and whites though please, time to begin a new iconography.
Code: Select all
14:03 RaikkonenPlsCare There's some water in water
kevinbotz wrote:
Hehehehehehehe.
I do prefer the sound of "McLaren-Honda" to "McLaren-Mercedes."
Shizuka wrote:AAAAAAND it's official!
mario wrote:It's going to be interesting to see whether Honda can actually produce a competitive engine, though, under the new regulations - Honda may have been competitive in the past when it came to turbo engines, but Renault Sport have indicated that Honda haven't been that active in the post 2014 engine regulation discussions. They are starting some way behind their rivals when it comes to building the engines - the indication from some publications, like Racecar Engineering, is that Honda have only started work on an F1 spec engine within the last 6 to 12 months, whereas Mercedes, Ferrari and Renault started a couple of years ago and have been dyno testing their engines for several months now.
Shizuka wrote:CoopsII wrote:McLaren - CHANGE THE LIVERY FOR 2015! No reds and whites though please, time to begin a new iconography.
Why not go back to the classic orange livery?
CoopsII wrote:Shizuka wrote:CoopsII wrote:McLaren - CHANGE THE LIVERY FOR 2015! No reds and whites though please, time to begin a new iconography.
Why not go back to the classic orange livery?
That would get my vote everytime. I guess it will be built around whatever primary sponsors they have for that year. In fact, they'll probably keep the silver and different silver just to annoy.
mario wrote:With the media hyping up the nostalgic link between McLaren, Honda and Senna, there might be a desire to revisit the famous white and red livery given that it is so iconic and representative of its era and its success.
CoopsII wrote:Biscione wrote:To the surprise of no-one, Daniil Kvyat wins ROTR for Sochi, by a record margin that may not be surpassed for some time.
I always knew Marko read this forum.
JeremyMcClean wrote:Am I the only one around here who will miss the McLaren-Mercedes partnership?
DanielPT wrote:Shizuka wrote:AAAAAAND it's official!
An happy guy I am! It is good to see Honda back as engines suppliers, their natural form!mario wrote:It's going to be interesting to see whether Honda can actually produce a competitive engine, though, under the new regulations - Honda may have been competitive in the past when it came to turbo engines, but Renault Sport have indicated that Honda haven't been that active in the post 2014 engine regulation discussions. They are starting some way behind their rivals when it comes to building the engines - the indication from some publications, like Racecar Engineering, is that Honda have only started work on an F1 spec engine within the last 6 to 12 months, whereas Mercedes, Ferrari and Renault started a couple of years ago and have been dyno testing their engines for several months now.
On the other hand, by starting later, they will be able to watch what the standard is and what the others have done. I am confident that Honda knowns how to build an engine as it managed in the past, although in their most recent F1 guise their lumps weren't much renowned.
mario wrote:DanielPT wrote:Shizuka wrote:AAAAAAND it's official!
An happy guy I am! It is good to see Honda back as engines suppliers, their natural form!mario wrote:It's going to be interesting to see whether Honda can actually produce a competitive engine, though, under the new regulations - Honda may have been competitive in the past when it came to turbo engines, but Renault Sport have indicated that Honda haven't been that active in the post 2014 engine regulation discussions. They are starting some way behind their rivals when it comes to building the engines - the indication from some publications, like Racecar Engineering, is that Honda have only started work on an F1 spec engine within the last 6 to 12 months, whereas Mercedes, Ferrari and Renault started a couple of years ago and have been dyno testing their engines for several months now.
On the other hand, by starting later, they will be able to watch what the standard is and what the others have done. I am confident that Honda knowns how to build an engine as it managed in the past, although in their most recent F1 guise their lumps weren't much renowned.
It is possible that this could cut both ways - whilst they may be missing out in development time on the one hand, on the other hand they are likely to have a clearer picture of the state of play come 2015.
I have to partially agree with Paul Hayes, though, that there are probably going to be some quite unrealistic expectations of how this relationship might pan out in the future. After all, whilst their record in the turbo era and the early years of the 3.5L formula that followed was pretty strong, their recent record in F1 has been more mixed - their V10's were fairly decent but not class leading (BMW, Ferrari, Renault and Mercedes were at least comparable and often better), and their V8's were average at best before slowly sliding back down the grid as development slowed.
I cannot see Honda providing McLaren with an engine that would be able to dominate the field, or even necessarily being superior to the Mercedes turbo engine (at least to begin with). That said, what I am happy is that, at the very least, we are seeing a broadening of the engine supply base given that, in recent years, it has been contracting sharply - hopefully, it'll put more pressure on the other engine suppliers to keep the cost of their engines down too.
Klon, on Alt-F1 wrote: I like to think it's more poker than gambling, though.
Fetzie on Ferrari wrote:How does a driver hurtling around a race track while they're sous-viding in their overalls have a better understanding of the race than a team of strategy engineers in an air-conditioned room?l
East Londoner wrote:Didn't Honda claim their V10s were producing 1000bhp by the final races of 2005?
reading into it it's not an exclusive deal either so if required Honda would supply another team who would be the likely candidates for this? all talking hypothetically I can see 1 maybe straight away
Zetec wrote:East Londoner wrote:Didn't Honda claim their V10s were producing 1000bhp by the final races of 2005?
And I remember a certain Jenson Button, saying: "It's not easy trying to plant this much power onto the circuit."reading into it it's not an exclusive deal either so if required Honda would supply another team who would be the likely candidates for this? all talking hypothetically I can see 1 maybe straight away
Yes, Honda is open to deliver other teams with engines, if required. http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/107448
East Londoner wrote:Didn't Honda claim their V10s were producing 1000bhp by the final races of 2005? Was this actually true, or just publicocrap to impress people in Japan before the race.
Well, at least this move will finally get rid of the insipid red and silver livery...
Zetec wrote:So, if I can judge the situation properly, they have to build the 2014 car around the Mercedes engine and change to whole damn thing for 2015 again.
And what do you guys think about the fact, that McLaren could deliver informations about the 2014 Mercedes engine to Honda for their preparation?
AndreaModa wrote:We got Williams Renault...
We now have McLaren Honda...
All I'm waiting for now is a moustachioed Brummie to announce his comeback in a Ferrari and we'll be all set!
Shizuka wrote:AAAAAAND it's official!
mario wrote:East Londoner wrote:Didn't Honda claim their V10s were producing 1000bhp by the final races of 2005? Was this actually true, or just publicocrap to impress people in Japan before the race.
The engine known as the "Suzuka Special", which was used at the tail end of the 2005 season, was supposedly close to 1000bhp (I think the figure is generally around the 985bhp mark), but that was only in the closing stages of that season.
Most of the time, though, it was BMW that was suspected of having the most powerful engines, although they probably didn't have quite the advantage that they had in previous years in 2005 (in part because, with their relationship with Williams being increasingly strained, BMW were perhaps less committed to development than they had been in the past).
AndreaModa wrote:All I'm waiting for now is a moustachioed Brummie to announce his comeback in a Ferrari and we'll be all set!
takagi_for_the_win wrote:Shizuka wrote:AAAAAAND it's official!
YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!mario wrote:East Londoner wrote:Didn't Honda claim their V10s were producing 1000bhp by the final races of 2005? Was this actually true, or just publicocrap to impress people in Japan before the race.
The engine known as the "Suzuka Special", which was used at the tail end of the 2005 season, was supposedly close to 1000bhp (I think the figure is generally around the 985bhp mark), but that was only in the closing stages of that season.
Most of the time, though, it was BMW that was suspected of having the most powerful engines, although they probably didn't have quite the advantage that they had in previous years in 2005 (in part because, with their relationship with Williams being increasingly strained, BMW were perhaps less committed to development than they had been in the past).
Didn't they produce "Suzuka Specials" every year from 2002 on?
And 2001-2003 was generally when the BMW's were regarded as superior, by 2004 I think most of their advantage had gone.
S951 wrote:is that a certain brazilian at monaco in your avatar good sir?
mediocre wrote:Nicolas Prost and Bruno Senna as driver line-up — make it happen!
Paul Hayes wrote:Very interesting that this has now been confirmed. Although they do say "never go back", and people expecting a renewed McLaren-Honda domination will probably be disappointed.
Benetton wrote:This is really good news for the sport! Hopefully Lotus switch to Honda as well. Then we'll have McLaren-Honda and Lotus-Honda
FullMetalJack wrote:Benetton wrote:This is really good news for the sport! Hopefully Lotus switch to Honda as well. Then we'll have McLaren-Honda and Lotus-Honda
Let's have Lotus Lamborghini instead. Bring back Lambo engines!
Albert Einstein wrote:Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe.
James1978 wrote:
I was even more stunned when I learned a top team like Williams had used them in 1988!
go_Rubens wrote:FullMetalJack wrote:Benetton wrote:This is really good news for the sport! Hopefully Lotus switch to Honda as well. Then we'll have McLaren-Honda and Lotus-Honda
Let's have Lotus Lamborghini instead. Bring back Lambo engines!
Not to burst your bubble or anything, but I don't think Lambo is into 6 cylinder engines.
FullMetalJack wrote:go_Rubens wrote:FullMetalJack wrote:Let's have Lotus Lamborghini instead. Bring back Lambo engines!
Not to burst your bubble or anything, but I don't think Lambo is into 6 cylinder engines.
Let a man dream, although in reality you're probably right.
James1978 wrote:Lotus-Judd.
When I got into F1 in the early 90s, I thought the name "Judd" sounded hilarious for an engine when it was up against well-known motoring companies like Honda, Renault, Ford and Ferrari, not knowing it was actually someone's name!
I was even more stunned when I learned a top team like Williams had used them in 1988!
kevinbotz wrote:Cantonese is a completely nonsensical f*cking alien language masquerading as some grossly bastardised form of Chinese
Gonzo wrote:Wasn't there some sort of communisim in the East part of Germany?
AndreaModa wrote:We got Williams Renault...
We now have McLaren Honda...
All I'm waiting for now is a moustachioed Brummie to announce his comeback in a Ferrari and we'll be all set!