Re: The F1 Memes thread
Posted: 20 Nov 2012, 07:09
kostas22 wrote:...And here's one I made earlier...
THAT'S CUTE
A tribute to the heroic failures of Grand Prix racing
https://www.gprejects.com/forum/
kostas22 wrote:...And here's one I made earlier...
dinizintheoven wrote:I've certainly posted it, but not here. And on the left is the only day Heikki Kovalainen ever tasted the victory champagne. Good job he made the most of it.
DanielPT wrote:dinizintheoven wrote:I've certainly posted it, but not here. And on the left is the only day Heikki Kovalainen ever tasted the victory champagne. Good job he made the most of it.
Still, race winner in far fewer starts than Rosberg and infinitely less starts than Heidfeld.
dr-baker wrote:DanielPT wrote:dinizintheoven wrote:I've certainly posted it, but not here. And on the left is the only day Heikki Kovalainen ever tasted the victory champagne. Good job he made the most of it.
Still, race winner in far fewer starts than Rosberg and infinitely less starts than Heidfeld.
Sorry, just had to.
dr-baker wrote:DanielPT wrote:dinizintheoven wrote:I've certainly posted it, but not here. And on the left is the only day Heikki Kovalainen ever tasted the victory champagne. Good job he made the most of it.
Still, race winner in far fewer starts than Rosberg and infinitely less starts than Heidfeld.
Sorry, just had to.
BlindCaveSalamander wrote:dr-baker wrote:DanielPT wrote:Still, race winner in far fewer starts than Rosberg and infinitely fewer starts than Heidfeld.
Sorry, just had to.
Erm, I'm pretty sure both words are acceptable in this instance.
dr-baker wrote:BlindCaveSalamander wrote:dr-baker wrote:Sorry, just had to.
Erm, I'm pretty sure both words are acceptable in this instance.
Nope, never. Fewer with countable nouns, less with uncountable nouns. It is possible to count how many starts each driver had before their first win, ergo it is fewer that one uses. So .
dr-baker wrote:BlindCaveSalamander wrote:dr-baker wrote:Sorry, just had to.
Erm, I'm pretty sure both words are acceptable in this instance.
Nope, never. Fewer with countable nouns, less with uncountable nouns. It is possible to count how many starts each driver had before their first win, ergo it is fewer that one uses. So .
dr-baker wrote:BlindCaveSalamander wrote:Erm, I'm pretty sure both words are acceptable in this instance.
Nope, never. Fewer with countable nouns, less with uncountable nouns. It is possible to count how many starts each driver had before their first win, ergo it is fewer that one uses. So .
shinji wrote:dr-baker wrote:BlindCaveSalamander wrote:Erm, I'm pretty sure both words are acceptable in this instance.
Nope, never. Fewer with countable nouns, less with uncountable nouns. It is possible to count how many starts each driver had before their first win, ergo it is fewer that one uses. So .
So how's your Portuguese dr?
takagi_for_the_win wrote:shinji wrote:dr-baker wrote:Nope, never. Fewer with countable nouns, less with uncountable nouns. It is possible to count how many starts each driver had before their first win, ergo it is fewer that one uses. So .
So how's your Portuguese dr?
Do you want some aloe vera for that burn dr?
BlindCaveSalamander wrote:Erm, I'm pretty sure both words are acceptable in this instance.
takagi_for_the_win wrote:shinji wrote:dr-baker wrote: Nope, never. Fewer with countable nouns, less with uncountable nouns. It is possible to count how many starts each driver had before their first win, ergo it is fewer that one uses. So .
So how's your Portuguese dr?
Do you want some aloe vera for that burn dr?
Shizuka wrote:Button was in Hungary yesterday (or the day before), and this popped up since then:
FMecha wrote:Shizuka wrote:Button was in Hungary yesterday (or the day before), and this popped up since then:
I know what you mean, but change "MP4-28" to "Life L190" and you will be right from reject POV.