2016 Silly Season Thread

The place for speaking your mind on current goings-on in F1
User avatar
CoopsII
Posts: 4676
Joined: 15 Dec 2011, 09:33
Location: Starkiller Base Debris

Re: 2016 Silly Season Thread

Post by CoopsII »


I do love the idea of some Exec going to the board and saying "Listen jungs, I know we've alot going on right now, but what about that F1 idea I had......?"
Just For One Day...
User avatar
Salamander
Posts: 9570
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 20:59
Location: trapped on some prison island

Re: 2016 Silly Season Thread

Post by Salamander »

In case any of you were holding out hope...

Sebastian Vettel wrote:If I was good at losing I wouldn't be in Formula 1.
Everything's great.
I'm not surprised about anything.
User avatar
DanielPT
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 6126
Joined: 30 Dec 2010, 18:44
Location: Porto, Portugal

Re: 2016 Silly Season Thread

Post by DanielPT »

CoopsII wrote:

I do love the idea of some Exec going to the board and saying "Listen jungs, I know we've alot going on right now, but what about that F1 idea I had......?"


True, the timing is definitely not right. But as most journos are starting to look away, they could do with an amazing publicity stunt by announcing that they will join both F1 and NASCAR next year. A few claps, some hurrah's and all is forgiven in the most of the world and the US respectively.
Colin Kolles on F111, 2011 HRT challenger: The car doesn't look too bad; it looks like a modern F1 car.
User avatar
CoopsII
Posts: 4676
Joined: 15 Dec 2011, 09:33
Location: Starkiller Base Debris

Re: 2016 Silly Season Thread

Post by CoopsII »

DanielPT wrote:But as most journos are starting to look away, they could do with an amazing publicity stunt by announcing that they will join both F1 and NASCAR next year. A few claps, some hurrah's and all is forgiven in the most of the world and the US respectively.

I'll have whatever he's having.

There is the small issue of the 18 billion US Dollar fine they're looking at. So far.
Just For One Day...
User avatar
Nuppiz
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 5939
Joined: 30 Mar 2009, 12:10
Location: Vantaa, Finland
Contact:

Re: 2016 Silly Season Thread

Post by Nuppiz »

CoopsII wrote:
DanielPT wrote:But as most journos are starting to look away, they could do with an amazing publicity stunt by announcing that they will join both F1 and NASCAR next year. A few claps, some hurrah's and all is forgiven in the most of the world and the US respectively.

I'll have whatever he's having.

There is the small issue of the 18 billion US Dollar fine they're looking at. So far.

And 7 billion dollars being spent to service all affected cars. Not to mention the loss in sales, as they've now stopped selling TDI cars in the US and their reputation throughout the world has been severely tarnished. Potentially their total losses can get so high that the amount of money lost could run a top F1 team for 30 years.
Eurosport broadcast for the 1990 Mexican GP prequalifying:
"The Life, it looked very lifeless yet again... in fact Bruno did one, slow lap"
IceG
Posts: 693
Joined: 06 Oct 2011, 17:24
Location: London (the one in England)

Re: 2016 Silly Season Thread

Post by IceG »

Just musing. I wonder if the prevarication over Jenson Button is because Alonso is walking away and they need a quality driver to lead the team next year so are trying to tempt Button to stay?
User avatar
CoopsII
Posts: 4676
Joined: 15 Dec 2011, 09:33
Location: Starkiller Base Debris

Re: 2016 Silly Season Thread

Post by CoopsII »

IceG wrote:Just musing. I wonder if the prevarication over Jenson Button is because Alonso is walking away and they need a quality driver to lead the team next year so are trying to tempt Button to stay?

I think if Alonso was leaving F1 we'd know by now. There are no other decent seats available so he has nothing to gain by playing coy and secretive.
Just For One Day...
User avatar
DanielPT
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 6126
Joined: 30 Dec 2010, 18:44
Location: Porto, Portugal

Re: 2016 Silly Season Thread

Post by DanielPT »

Nuppiz wrote:
CoopsII wrote:
DanielPT wrote:But as most journos are starting to look away, they could do with an amazing publicity stunt by announcing that they will join both F1 and NASCAR next year. A few claps, some hurrah's and all is forgiven in the most of the world and the US respectively.

I'll have whatever he's having.

There is the small issue of the 18 billion US Dollar fine they're looking at. So far.

And 7 billion dollars being spent to service all affected cars. Not to mention the loss in sales, as they've now stopped selling TDI cars in the US and their reputation throughout the world has been severely tarnished. Potentially their total losses can get so high that the amount of money lost could run a top F1 team for 30 years.


I am willing to bet that things won't go that extreme. Not to mention that, if it reaches somewhere close to those values, the German Government will most probably step in since VW is to big to fail.

Also, when I said all was forgiven, I meant from the consumer point of view not from a government one. And some sideways stuff like a positive stunt at just the right time could do wonders to VW image. But maybe this view of mine comes from living in a country where people have such a thick skin when it comes to corruption and fraud. One thing I agree though. Diesel market is probably dead in the US. And they will have a few law cases to settle.
Colin Kolles on F111, 2011 HRT challenger: The car doesn't look too bad; it looks like a modern F1 car.
User avatar
CoopsII
Posts: 4676
Joined: 15 Dec 2011, 09:33
Location: Starkiller Base Debris

Re: 2016 Silly Season Thread

Post by CoopsII »

DPT, do you have shares in VW or something? Never mind 'Autosport or it didn't happen' this stuff is 'U.S. Environmental Protection Agency knows it happened and isnt going to let it go'.
Just For One Day...
User avatar
DanielPT
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 6126
Joined: 30 Dec 2010, 18:44
Location: Porto, Portugal

Re: 2016 Silly Season Thread

Post by DanielPT »

CoopsII wrote:DPT, do you have shares in VW or something? Never mind 'Autosport or it didn't happen' this stuff is 'U.S. Environmental Protection Agency knows it happened and isnt going to let it go'.


Should've bought some when they were at 97 pounds. They are now at 110 pounds. And up until the publication of the affected engines it will probably go up some more. Yes, the US government will fine VW, probably half of the maximum fine, and they will also have to recall those affected cars (at least in the US and maybe on the UK). In the rest of the Europe it will probably stay at the owner's wishes to return the car to the factory for a fix. Perhaps it will also have some small fines here in there except in those places where they have factories that are heavily sponsored by the governments like in Portugal. It will dent some of their sales sure, specially in the US but overall but I predict, at most, to losses at about a 3/4 of that 18bn dollars. Of course I could be entirely wrong, but the future will tell that. Remember, how many tobacco companies went bankrupt when they had those huge scandals back in the nineties?
Colin Kolles on F111, 2011 HRT challenger: The car doesn't look too bad; it looks like a modern F1 car.
User avatar
Londoner
Posts: 6428
Joined: 17 Jun 2010, 18:21
Location: Norwich, UK
Contact:

Re: 2016 Silly Season Thread

Post by Londoner »

Romain Grosjean to Haas is a done deal. I am now suddenly excite that this could lead Grosjean to the Scuderia proper in 2017, to replace Raikkonen. :D

Shame that it looks like Gutierrez will be getting the second seat but hey, he could redeem his reputation with a solid season next year.
Fetzie on Ferrari wrote:How does a driver hurtling around a race track while they're sous-viding in their overalls have a better understanding of the race than a team of strategy engineers in an air-conditioned room?l
User avatar
Backmarker
Posts: 1126
Joined: 19 Mar 2012, 17:59

Re: 2016 Silly Season Thread

Post by Backmarker »

Romain Grosjean has signed with Haas, and Renault have bid for Lotus - interestingly, the deal has the possibility for someone to outbid Renault, which seems unlikely.
The Iceman Waiteth
What if Kimi Räikkönen hadn't got his chance in 2001?
User avatar
CoopsII
Posts: 4676
Joined: 15 Dec 2011, 09:33
Location: Starkiller Base Debris

Re: 2016 Silly Season Thread

Post by CoopsII »

East Londoner wrote:Romain Grosjean to Haas is a done deal.

Is there any truth in the rumour that one of the conditions of Romain signing was that Haas would at least feed him at the races?
Just For One Day...
User avatar
Wallio
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 2628
Joined: 22 Feb 2012, 22:54
Location: The Wyoming Valley, PA

Re: 2016 Silly Season Thread

Post by Wallio »

http://motorsports.nbcsports.com/2015/0 ... erns-grow/

Lotus is finished. Very late arriving freight, no PR/Hospitality center, and Bernie has to step in to feed the mechanics. Plus if the Renault deal doesn't go through by Monday, they are going into administration.
Professional Historian/Retired Drag Racer/Whiskey Enthusiast

"He makes the move on the outside, and knowing George as we do, he's probably on the radio right now telling the team how great he is." - James Hinchcliffe on George Russell
User avatar
James1978
Posts: 3042
Joined: 26 Jul 2010, 18:46
Location: Darlington, NE England

Re: 2016 Silly Season Thread

Post by James1978 »

CoopsII wrote:
IceG wrote:Just musing. I wonder if the prevarication over Jenson Button is because Alonso is walking away and they need a quality driver to lead the team next year so are trying to tempt Button to stay?

I think if Alonso was leaving F1 we'd know by now. There are no other decent seats available so he has nothing to gain by playing coy and secretive.


Hmm.....now there's a vacancy at Lotus/Enstone/Renault with Grosjean moving on, Alonso might just be tempted to return "home"! It's probably a better bet for him than McLaren is right now.

But McLaren REALLY don't need to be stuck with two youngsters in the situation they're currently in, so it all seems to fit that they need Button to stay!!
"Poor old Warwick takes it from behind all throughout this season". :) (Tony Jardine, 1988)
User avatar
dr-baker
Posts: 15488
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 17:30
Location: Here and there.

Re: 2016 Silly Season Thread

Post by dr-baker »

Wallio wrote:http://motorsports.nbcsports.com/2015/09/25/lotus-freight-arrives-late-in-japan-as-financial-concerns-grow/

Lotus is finished. Very late arriving freight, no PR/Hospitality center, and Bernie has to step in to feed the mechanics. Plus if the Renault deal doesn't go through by Monday, they are going into administration.

At the moment, it looks like a sensible move for Grosjean to jump before being pushed, even if 2016 Haas is less competitive than 2015 Lotus (as I suspect will be the case).
watka wrote:I find it amusing that whilst you're one of the more openly Christian guys here, you are still first and foremost associated with an eye for the ladies!
dinizintheoven wrote:GOOD CHRISTIANS do not go to jail. EVERYONE ON FORMULA ONE REJECTS should be in jail.
MCard LOLA
User avatar
CoopsII
Posts: 4676
Joined: 15 Dec 2011, 09:33
Location: Starkiller Base Debris

Re: 2016 Silly Season Thread

Post by CoopsII »

James1978 wrote:
CoopsII wrote:
IceG wrote:Just musing. I wonder if the prevarication over Jenson Button is because Alonso is walking away and they need a quality driver to lead the team next year so are trying to tempt Button to stay?

I think if Alonso was leaving F1 we'd know by now. There are no other decent seats available so he has nothing to gain by playing coy and secretive.


Hmm.....now there's a vacancy at Lotus/Enstone/Renault with Grosjean moving on, Alonso might just be tempted to return "home"! It's probably a better bet for him than McLaren is right now.

Sounds like it's a home that's about to be repossessed though. Alonso may as well stay put, one under-performing team with cash-flow problems is very much like the rest.
Just For One Day...
User avatar
mario
Posts: 8110
Joined: 31 Oct 2009, 17:13

Re: 2016 Silly Season Thread

Post by mario »

CoopsII wrote:Sounds like it's a home that's about to be repossessed though. Alonso may as well stay put, one under-performing team with cash-flow problems is very much like the rest.

I agree - bad though things are at McLaren, you would nevertheless expect them to at least make it through to 2016, whilst we cannot be certain that will be the case with Lotus.
Martin Brundle, on watching a replay of Grosjean spinning:
"The problem with Grosjean is that he want to take a look back at the corner he's just exited"
User avatar
Ataxia
Not Important
Posts: 6861
Joined: 23 Jun 2010, 12:47
Location: Sneed's Feed & Seed (formerly Chuck's)
Contact:

Re: 2016 Silly Season Thread

Post by Ataxia »

Wallio wrote:http://motorsports.nbcsports.com/2015/09/25/lotus-freight-arrives-late-in-japan-as-financial-concerns-grow/

Lotus is finished. Very late arriving freight, no PR/Hospitality center, and Bernie has to step in to feed the mechanics. Plus if the Renault deal doesn't go through by Monday, they are going into administration.


It's alleged that Renault have paid the HMRC costs, and should be on their way to concluding the takeover at some point; according to Rachel Brooks, a Lotus employee has suggested it's a case of when rather than if. We'll have to see.
Mitch Hedberg wrote:I want to be a race car passenger: just a guy who bugs the driver. Say man, can I turn on the radio? You should slow down. Why do we gotta keep going in circles? Man, you really like Tide...
User avatar
CaptainGetz12
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 1851
Joined: 06 Mar 2013, 03:19
Location: Sacramento, CA, USA
Contact:

Re: 2016 Silly Season Thread

Post by CaptainGetz12 »

Ataxia wrote:
Wallio wrote:http://motorsports.nbcsports.com/2015/09/25/lotus-freight-arrives-late-in-japan-as-financial-concerns-grow/

Lotus is finished. Very late arriving freight, no PR/Hospitality center, and Bernie has to step in to feed the mechanics. Plus if the Renault deal doesn't go through by Monday, they are going into administration.


It's alleged that Renault have paid the HMRC costs, and should be on their way to concluding the takeover at some point; according to Rachel Brooks, a Lotus employee has suggested it's a case of when rather than if. We'll have to see.


That would be one race off from being the second year in a row that a team goes to administration at the same race. Hopefully the team can muster enough to make it through the season...
Klon wrote:What did poor André do to you for him to be insulted like that?
User avatar
Spectoremg
Posts: 517
Joined: 27 Dec 2014, 21:39
Location: Portsmouth, Hampshire, UK

Re: 2016 Silly Season Thread

Post by Spectoremg »

Confident rumours about Renault from the above. I'm guessing they're confident the cold wind of emissions-gate won't be blowing their way.
User avatar
AndreaModa
Posts: 5806
Joined: 30 Mar 2009, 17:51
Location: Bristol, UK

Re: 2016 Silly Season Thread

Post by AndreaModa »

Spectoremg wrote:Confident rumours about Renault from the above. I'm guessing they're confident the cold wind of emissions-gate won't be blowing their way.


Well every single manufacturer on the planet will know right this second whether they're implicated or not. What remains is how quiet those ones we don't know about yet can stay.
I want my MTV...Simtek Ford

My Motorsport Photos

@DNPQ_
Whiteshore
Posts: 165
Joined: 17 Aug 2015, 00:03

Re: 2016 Silly Season Thread

Post by Whiteshore »

Maybe Red Bull could try making a "in-house" engine or even lure Chevrolet to F1?
Unafraid of the papaya!
User avatar
girry
Posts: 838
Joined: 31 May 2012, 19:43

Re: 2016 Silly Season Thread

Post by girry »

GM hasnt even been in any credible f1 rumours since I've followed F1, and (discounting Ilmor) they don't have their own motorsport facilities that are capable of producing engines, either. I'd be less surprised if Kia came forth tomorrow and announced they'll join F1 as a completely new team than if Chevy joined f1.
when you're dead people start listening
User avatar
Salamander
Posts: 9570
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 20:59
Location: trapped on some prison island

Re: 2016 Silly Season Thread

Post by Salamander »

giraurd wrote:GM hasnt even been in any credible f1 rumours since I've followed F1, and (discounting Ilmor) they don't have their own motorsport facilities that are capable of producing engines, either. I'd be less surprised if Kia came forth tomorrow and announced they'll join F1 as a completely new team than if Chevy joined f1.


Indeed - in fact I'm pretty sure GM have never been involved in F1 in any form.
Sebastian Vettel wrote:If I was good at losing I wouldn't be in Formula 1.
Everything's great.
I'm not surprised about anything.
Whiteshore
Posts: 165
Joined: 17 Aug 2015, 00:03

Re: 2016 Silly Season Thread

Post by Whiteshore »

I think GM was indirectly involved in F1 between 1991-92 with Ilmor, which was then part-owned by Chevrolet, supplying engines to Leyton House/March and Tyrrell and could Red Bull use Cosworth engines next year?
Unafraid of the papaya!
User avatar
Backmarker
Posts: 1126
Joined: 19 Mar 2012, 17:59

Re: 2016 Silly Season Thread

Post by Backmarker »

Salamander wrote:
giraurd wrote:GM hasnt even been in any credible f1 rumours since I've followed F1, and (discounting Ilmor) they don't have their own motorsport facilities that are capable of producing engines, either. I'd be less surprised if Kia came forth tomorrow and announced they'll join F1 as a completely new team than if Chevy joined f1.


Indeed - in fact I'm pretty sure GM have never been involved in F1 in any form.


Did they have any involvement in the Detroit GP? It used to go right round their headquarters.
The Iceman Waiteth
What if Kimi Räikkönen hadn't got his chance in 2001?
User avatar
FMecha
Posts: 5145
Joined: 04 Jan 2011, 16:18
Location: Open road
Contact:

Re: 2016 Silly Season Thread

Post by FMecha »

Whiteshore wrote:Maybe Red Bull could try making a "in-house" engine or even lure Chevrolet to F1?


I'm always open to Red Bull building their own engines at this point, but they always said no. :evil:
PSN ID: FMecha_EXE | FMecha on GT Sport
User avatar
Bobby Doorknobs
Posts: 4059
Joined: 30 Jul 2014, 17:52
Location: In a safe place.

Re: 2016 Silly Season Thread

Post by Bobby Doorknobs »

Whiteshore wrote:Maybe Red Bull could try making a "in-house" engine or even lure Chevrolet to F1?

a.) How? b.) How?
Whiteshore wrote:...and could Red Bull use Cosworth engines next year?

and c.) How?
#FreeGonzo
User avatar
Waris
Posts: 1781
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 01:07
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands

Re: 2016 Silly Season Thread

Post by Waris »

It's times like these that make you wish they had equalized that "World Engine" sooner, so that you could just pop an engine out of WEC and stick it in an F1 car, isn't it.
MOTOR RACING IS DANGEROUS
User avatar
mario
Posts: 8110
Joined: 31 Oct 2009, 17:13

Re: 2016 Silly Season Thread

Post by mario »

Waris wrote:It's times like these that make you wish they had equalized that "World Engine" sooner, so that you could just pop an engine out of WEC and stick it in an F1 car, isn't it.

Even if they had equalised the "World Engine" concept, it is worth noting that it wouldn't have necessarily made it simple to interchange engines between series. There would have been a certain amount of standardisation of formats, but the proposal was intended to maintain a certain amount of differences between series to tailor the performance - so you still wouldn't necessarily have been able to quickly strip an engine out of a WEC car and to stick it straight into an F1 car, for example.

Backmarker wrote:Romain Grosjean has signed with Haas, and Renault have bid for Lotus - interestingly, the deal has the possibility for someone to outbid Renault, which seems unlikely.

I am somewhat surprised that this hasn't generated more attention, because I would have said that Grosjean is a pretty strong driver for Haas to have hired. It is also interesting that Grosjean has gone for this move even with the possibility - and seemingly now the certainty - that Renault are buying into the Lotus team to make it into a full works team, which you would have thought might have offered the team a more stable long term future.

Either way, it creates a difficult situation for Manor right now - the Mercedes-Manor talks have effectively stalled because Mercedes is now unsure whether Lotus will or will not be using their engines next year.
Martin Brundle, on watching a replay of Grosjean spinning:
"The problem with Grosjean is that he want to take a look back at the corner he's just exited"
User avatar
Rob Dylan
Posts: 3493
Joined: 18 May 2014, 15:34
Location: Andy Warhol's basement

Re: 2016 Silly Season Thread

Post by Rob Dylan »

*SILLY QUESTION ALERT*
Wait a second! So Renault are buying fully into the Enstone team which they'd fully owned only 5 years ago but then pulled out of. I don't even remember why they dropped out in the first place, but whatever the reason was, why are they suddenly buying it back now?
Murray Walker at the 1997 Austrian Grand Prix wrote:The other [Stewart] driver, who nobody's been paying attention to, because he's disappointing, is Jan Magnussen.
Felipe Nasr - the least forgettable F1 driver!
User avatar
Backmarker
Posts: 1126
Joined: 19 Mar 2012, 17:59

Re: 2016 Silly Season Thread

Post by Backmarker »

Rob Dylan wrote:*SILLY QUESTION ALERT*
Wait a second! So Renault are buying fully into the Enstone team which they'd fully owned only 5 years ago but then pulled out of. I don't even remember why they dropped out in the first place, but whatever the reason was, why are they suddenly buying it back now?


Back in 2009/10 they were contending with a global financial crisis, Crashgate, being regularly beaten by a customer team (Red Bull), and not having Briatore around any more (who had essentially built Renault's team). Since then, the financial market has improved, and Renault have found that if they win as an engine supplier they get very little credit, but if they lose as an engine supplier, fingers quickly get pointed their way. Mercedes are getting far more monetisable exposure from their involvement in F1 as a team owner than Renault got from powering Vettel to 4 World Championships.
The Iceman Waiteth
What if Kimi Räikkönen hadn't got his chance in 2001?
User avatar
good_Ralf
Posts: 2681
Joined: 06 Jun 2013, 13:14
Location: Hitchin, UK

Re: 2016 Silly Season Thread

Post by good_Ralf »

mario wrote:I am somewhat surprised that this hasn't generated more attention, because I would have said that Grosjean is a pretty strong driver for Haas to have hired. It is also interesting that Grosjean has gone for this move even with the possibility - and seemingly now the certainty - that Renault are buying into the Lotus team to make it into a full works team, which you would have thought might have offered the team a more stable long term future.


And if in 2016/7 Haas trundle 2 laps behind the Marussias and Lotus/Renault move up from the field, I and Grosjean will be like :facepalm: :mrgreen:
Hopefully Romain's move works.
Check out the position of the sun on 2 August at 20:08 in my garden

Allard Kalff in 1994 wrote:OH!! Schumacher in the wall! Right in front of us, Michael Schumacher is in the wall! He's hit the pitwall, he c... Ah, it's Jos Verstappen.
User avatar
Klon
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 7205
Joined: 28 Mar 2009, 17:07
Location: Schleswig-Holstein, FRG
Contact:

Re: 2016 Silly Season Thread

Post by Klon »

mario wrote:It is also interesting that Grosjean has gone for this move even with the possibility - and seemingly now the certainty - that Renault are buying into the Lotus team to make it into a full works team, which you would have thought might have offered the team a more stable long term future.


Nothing is official until announced. Would you, as a driver, bet your career (because if this Renault thing doesn't work out, Grosjean could kiss his career goodbye) on a company that may or may not come in or may or may not be competitive? Or, say, would you go with the team that is officially confirmed to join F1 and seems to have at least a smart head at the top?
sswishbone
Posts: 1157
Joined: 25 Mar 2011, 06:23
Location: England

Re: 2016 Silly Season Thread

Post by sswishbone »

Let's not forget that Bernie has dangled a huge carrot by saying they'll qualify as a team for extra funds from the pot too. Be aware that if Red Bull fail to resolve their engine situation and Renault decide to stick them by not supplying engines... Two teams could end up on one year hiatus at minimum. Having a manufacturer step in would paper over some of the cracks of an 18 car field.
"Hispania are a waste of talent and petrol!" Martin Brundle, Australia Qualifying 2011

Live streams and podcasts from yours truly at http://www.youtube.com/user/sswishbone
User avatar
dinizintheoven
Posts: 3993
Joined: 09 Dec 2010, 01:24

Re: 2016 Silly Season Thread

Post by dinizintheoven »

mario wrote:
Waris wrote:It's times like these that make you wish they had equalized that "World Engine" sooner, so that you could just pop an engine out of WEC and stick it in an F1 car, isn't it.

Even if they had equalised the "World Engine" concept, it is worth noting that it wouldn't have necessarily made it simple to interchange engines between series. There would have been a certain amount of standardisation of formats, but the proposal was intended to maintain a certain amount of differences between series to tailor the performance - so you still wouldn't necessarily have been able to quickly strip an engine out of a WEC car and to stick it straight into an F1 car, for example.

Does anyone remember what I said a while ago about a 21st Century equivalent of Formula 5000? 2-litre stock blocks, buy your engines from a local car dealer, tune and tweak them as much as you dare, whack on a turbo or six, maybe even a supercharger... we'd have none of this crazy musical chairs business, none of the uncertainty over every team bar Merc, Ferrari and (presumably) Haas, and the costs would be so low that even Forza Rossa could have come in with an engine from a Dacia Sandero and not completely embarrassed themselves. Even McLaren would be firing on all (four) cylinders and Fernando wouldn't be wailing about having a GP2 engine.

Bernie, send a cheque. I'll PM you my address.
James Allen, on his favourite F1 engine of all time:
"...the Life W12, I can't describe the noise to you, but imagine filling your dustbin with nuts and bolts, and then throwing it down the stairs, it was something akin to that!"
User avatar
Dj_bereta
Posts: 1513
Joined: 30 Aug 2009, 15:55

Re: 2016 Silly Season Thread

Post by Dj_bereta »

CoopsII wrote:
IceG wrote:Just musing. I wonder if the prevarication over Jenson Button is because Alonso is walking away and they need a quality driver to lead the team next year so are trying to tempt Button to stay?

I think if Alonso was leaving F1 we'd know by now. There are no other decent seats available so he has nothing to gain by playing coy and secretive.


Alonso can gamble if Red Bull leaves F1: http://www.skysports.com/f1/news/24100/ ... f1-pundits

If Red Bull get out of F1, sure Mercedes and Ferrari will put a third car to fill the field. Sure Alonso will be one of the options for Mercedes in the third car. A race winning car that the Spaniard wants so much.
Waiting for Lotus hiring Johnny Cecotto jr.
User avatar
AndreaModa
Posts: 5806
Joined: 30 Mar 2009, 17:51
Location: Bristol, UK

Re: 2016 Silly Season Thread

Post by AndreaModa »

No chance of third cars, not in the present financial climate. What do Ferrari and Mercedes get out of it for fielding a third car? An even bigger bill for running the team (extra personnel, equipment, organisation, etc) and for a driver who won't be as good as either team's first drivers (Hamilton, Vettel) except maybe Alonso, but why would either take him on in a third car to potentially disrupt an environment within the team that benefits both Mercedes and Ferrari? They both have two top drivers capable of podiums and victories - why upset that balance, or spend a ton of money running a kid who will inevitably add little to what they already have.

And how would the other teams feel if this third car was eligible for points? I highly doubt it would be, which is therefore even less favourable for Mercedes or Ferrari to field the extra car.

In short, won't happen unless we end up with a grid of about 10-12 cars which all being well, won't happen either.
I want my MTV...Simtek Ford

My Motorsport Photos

@DNPQ_
User avatar
mario
Posts: 8110
Joined: 31 Oct 2009, 17:13

Re: 2016 Silly Season Thread

Post by mario »

Dj_bereta wrote:
CoopsII wrote:
IceG wrote:Just musing. I wonder if the prevarication over Jenson Button is because Alonso is walking away and they need a quality driver to lead the team next year so are trying to tempt Button to stay?

I think if Alonso was leaving F1 we'd know by now. There are no other decent seats available so he has nothing to gain by playing coy and secretive.


Alonso can gamble if Red Bull leaves F1: http://www.skysports.com/f1/news/24100/ ... f1-pundits

If Red Bull get out of F1, sure Mercedes and Ferrari will put a third car to fill the field. Sure Alonso will be one of the options for Mercedes in the third car. A race winning car that the Spaniard wants so much.

Well, we have heard Ron Dennis claim that he is keen to keep Button on, a decision which may be motivated by his links with Honda at a time when the relationship between Honda and McLaren is likely to be strained.

As for Alonso, though, he is in a difficult situation - there are few teams which could afford his salary and provide him with a competitive car, such that he does not really seem to have any options. In all honesty, he probably has few options than either sticking with McLaren and hoping that Honda can make a major recovery or bailing out early and moving to another series, such as the WEC, where he could cut a competitive deal with a major manufacturer.

AndreaModa wrote:No chance of third cars, not in the present financial climate. What do Ferrari and Mercedes get out of it for fielding a third car? An even bigger bill for running the team (extra personnel, equipment, organisation, etc) and for a driver who won't be as good as either team's first drivers (Hamilton, Vettel) except maybe Alonso, but why would either take him on in a third car to potentially disrupt an environment within the team that benefits both Mercedes and Ferrari? They both have two top drivers capable of podiums and victories - why upset that balance, or spend a ton of money running a kid who will inevitably add little to what they already have.

And how would the other teams feel if this third car was eligible for points? I highly doubt it would be, which is therefore even less favourable for Mercedes or Ferrari to field the extra car.

In short, won't happen unless we end up with a grid of about 10-12 cars which all being well, won't happen either.

The whole mechanics of third cars currently seem to be very much up in the air - it kind of feels like one of those situations where most parties really seem to hope that they don't end up in a situation where they ever have to run third cars.

Now, whilst I imagine that Bernie would try to move heaven and earth to get Alonso into a third Mercedes if that were to pass - he would probably bank on a prize fight between Alonso and Hamilton really drawing in the crowds - Mercedes have always seemed rather ambivalent at best towards the idea of third cars, and seem to prefer to have more manufacturers rather than fewer.
Martin Brundle, on watching a replay of Grosjean spinning:
"The problem with Grosjean is that he want to take a look back at the corner he's just exited"
Post Reply